[Kseniya Dockhorn]

in reply to: Interactions to be shown correctly in the regression results table #16427

Thank you for the update. I believe you have missunderstood the issue I have encounted though… – it is not about changing “#” to “x”.
Let me try to explain again.

If I use the the “label” option to have variable lable names shown instead of variable names used in the coding (e.g. “Industry munificence” instead of “imunif”), all interactions are shown as “” – without any name stated at all (!).

I get this (“/” is added to show separations between the columns):
“Industry munificence, w / 0.11 / (0.13)
c / 1.29 / (0.82)
c / -2.65** / (1.28)”

Instead of the following:
“Industry munificence, w / 0.11 / (0.13)
Service relatedness x Industry munificence, w / 1.29 / (0.82)
Service relatedness x Service relatedness x Industry munificence, w / -2.65** / (1.28)”

Or even better something like this, where “2” is superscript:
“Industry munificence, w / 0.11 / (0.13)
Service relatedness x Industry munificence, w / 1.29 / (0.82)
Service relatedness2 x Industry munificence, w / -2.65** / (1.28)”

Or is there maybe existing solution already for this I don’t know about?

[Kseniya Dockhorn]

in reply to: Interactions to be shown correctly in the regression results table #16419

That would be really great feature! I believe normally it would be reported as:
VarA x VarB
VarA2 x VarB (with “2” being superscript as it is showing square effect)

E.g. https://i.stack.imgur.com/KTcdN.jpg or here in the Fang et al article on p. 11 with quadratic effects: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Firm-Level-Moderators-of-the-Effect-of-Service-Ratio-on-Firm-Value-A-Moderating-Effect_fig2_215915675

[Author]

Posts